User:AddieGrace/Neurodiversity/Agreeves Peer Review

General info
AddieGrace
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Neurodiversity

Evaluate the drafted changes
The biggest question I had upon reading the draft pertained to where exactly in the original article that this information would be added in, or where it might replace other information. Additionally, I definitely feel as if the draft could benefit from some restructuring of sentences, as some sections were a bit difficult to read without having to read back over again to get the meaning. Most of the resources being used were recently published, meaning that the information being cited is recent in addition to being relevant to the topic, both of which are important. Furthermore, I feel as if the information being added in is important for understanding the topic of neurodiversity as a whole, and I believe that this information can help to provide others with a better understanding of the topic if it can be implemented in an effective and efficient way. So far, the contributions are complementary of the article, and if they can be adjusted to flow a bit more smoothly, they will be excellent additions. Keep up the good work!