User:AddieGrace/Neurodiversity/LaDonna205 Peer Review

General info
(AddieGrace)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AddieGrace/Neurodiversity
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(When reviewing the article, I immediately get a message indicating that the article needs additional citations and may contain unsourced perditions,  speculative material, or accounts of events that might not occur. The lead section appear to have excessive citations. It would be better to summarize the lead section from a few different sources as opposed to 12 different sources. The content doesn't appear to be neutral based on the notification from Wikipedia. It would help to identify the content that appears to be bias and remove it. Upon reviewing your contribution, I think that its appropriate for the articles topic. It brief and concise and adds value to the topic. The structure of the article does not appear to be in a sensible order. It would be better to remove the 'Within disability rights movement' and 'Social Media' sections or provide a brief summarization with links for more detailed information to another Wikipedia page.)