User:Adedayo11/sandbox

Human Right Abuse By The United Kingdom Border Agency By Adedayo Adetanmi

Sixty years after rights was issued,the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is still more a dream than reality. Violations exist in every part of the world including here in the Uk.Human rights exist,as enacted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the entire body of international human rights law. They are recognized—at least in principle—by most nations differently and form the heart of many national constitutions which most times are not adhered to simply by virtue of race,discrimination and politicking. Yet the actual situation in the world is far distant from the ideals envisioned in the Declaration. To Ukba,the full realization of human rights is a remote and unattainable goal.Even international human rights laws are difficult to enforce and pursuing a complaint can take years and a great deal of time. These international laws serve as a restraining function but are insufficient to provide adequate human rights protection, as evidenced by my experience with the reality of abuses and cunny,hanky-panky interpretation of human rights perpetrated daily by Ukba.Discrimination is the order of the day with United Kingdom Border Agency.

WHAT ARE HUMAN RIGHTS? Human rights are based on the principle of respect for the individual. The fundamental assumption is that each person is a moral and rational being who deserves to be treated with dignity. This is called human rights because they are universal.human rights are the rights to which everyone is entitled—no matter who they are or where they live—simply because they are alive.Qualified Rights–Examples of qualified rights include the right to respect for private and family life, the right to freedom of expression and the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion.

Proportionality

The principle of proportionality is central to the human rights framework. It helps to ensure that any interference with a right is kept to a minimum.

Certain questions can be asked to help decide if an action is proportionate: •What is left of the person’s rights if we take this action? •Is there an alternative approach to the problem that would restrict the right any less? •Is there anything that we can do to minimise the need to restrict the right?