User:Adeledaniels5/Language deprivation in children with hearing loss/Carmadima Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Language Deprivation with Hearing Loss


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Adeledaniels5/Language deprivation in children with hearing loss
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Language deprivation in children with hearing loss
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Language deprivation in children with hearing loss
 * Language deprivation in children with hearing loss

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

When I first read the article, I was perplexed as to why the conflict and controversies were included in the prevention section. They should, in my opinion, be moved to a different section that focuses on conflict and controversies. Audism in conflicts and controversies should be explained more thoroughly, and you should address why audism persists in the medical community and early intervention programs.

With the proper references or sources, you can provide a more detailed explanation of why code switching is beneficial for deaf children. You should specify which modality is beneficial for deaf children who are language-deprived.