User:Adelinegrace219/Island glass lizard/Savannah35 Peer Review

General info
Adelinegrace219
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adelinegrace219/Island_glass_lizard/Savannah35_Peer_Review?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_peer_review
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:Adelinegrace219/Island glass lizard

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: Good and start to the point.

Content: Contact added is relevant to the topic. There are most content that I think you might want to think about adding which will be listed below. You can add some history of the island glass lizard.

Topics that you might want to include:


 * Where did the island glass lizard originated from?
 * Is the island glass lizard endangered or not?
 * What is there habitat like?
 * What do they eat?
 * Population of island glass lizard?
 * Are they poisonous?
 * Can you identify them by a curtain sound?
 * How do they defend themself?
 * Is there anything else you can add to the appearance and identification / Anatomy?
 * Do they lay eggs if so what do there eggs look like?

Tone and Balance: The content is neutral. They don't have a particular position when reading there edits.

Sources and References: When I checked the Reference I knows that the Ophisaurus compresses article from the reptile database have no link to the article but I copied the website into google and it didn't work but one type the name of the article into google I was able to get to the article that way. For The Eastern/Central North American I wasn't able to get to the article there no link or website. When I googled the article I couldn't find it. I recommend you to add the link to the article so the reader don't have to search to find the article that was used. The other two references are good and I was able to get to the article.

Organization: It is organized into sections that reflect the major points of the topics, easy to read, clear and I didn't find any grammatical or spelling errors.

Overall impressions: There wasn't a lot of information added or edited made so I add things that you might want to think about.