User:Aderush/Greenhouse gas emissions/LandonA77 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead
The lead hasn't been updated, I think there aren't enough citations in this section to back up statements, so I would look to add some. A brief description of key content areas could be discussed here, so the reader knows the general idea of what is going to be covered. The lead is easy to understand and doesn't contain any grammatical mistakes.

Content
There is a lot of content that is backed up by many citations. For the content you wrote in your sandbox, I think it was done really well, however, I think there could be a few more citations, particularly in the first paragraph. I'm unsure if statements that talk about how to reduce emissions should be included in this section or given its own section, since it comes off as biased.

Tone and Balance
The entire article and a little bit in the sandbox draft comes off as biased towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions (which I think is a good thing), however, I think this Wikipedia's main focus should be to address solely where greenhouse gas emissions are coming from and their impact, and not including statements on how to reduce it. Possibly there could be a section on how to reduce GHG emissions.

Sources and References
There are a lot of references used, but not every statement was supported by a citation. Within the sandbox draft, I think adding a few more sources and/or adding the citations to support statements in the first paragraph should be good.

Organization
This was done really well and flowed nicely. Each paragraph in the draft has its own topic and paragraphs aren't too long or too short.

Images and Media
I'll focus on the ones in the Sandbox draft. Each image is properly captioned and citied. I don't think you can use the livestock image, since it comes from a person's specific farm that was named. Also, I'm not sure if this image is really necessary either, since it doesn't add much to this section.

Overall Impressions
I think there is a lot of information that was presented in a clear and concise manner. This article contained a lot of references, I would make sure to add a few more to back up some statements, while omitting statements that seem overly biased. Overall, I think you did a really good job.