User:Adg21a/Basking in reflected glory/Ljc22b Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Adg21a, Tallahasseesportscaster, Seminolegaltay, Cally121 Link to draft you're reviewing  User:Adg21a/Basking in reflected glory  Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)  Basking in reflected glory

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - The lead provided by the original article does seem pretty good, but the fact that there is no picture to the right side of it does make the framing of the whole opening feel less like the average Wikipedia article that I am used to. I don't really see any kinds of edits to it within your own sandbox, which seems fine to me. The lead that is provided in the main article is good but, again, the framing with an added picture could be nice.

Content - The new content that you guys’ plan to add to the article is all around excellent. It seems as if you guys try to keep a very balanced tone in regard to how BIRGing affects the average user in the parts that you write. If I had any complaint, it is how almost the entirety of the "male vs. female" section is devoted to a study conducted by just one writer. If there is no other research you guys can find on this particular sect of the topic I understand, but it wouldn't least be beneficial to word it in such a way that it feels more objective as opposed to just the work of one man (at least that's what seems right in my mind I don't know if Wikipedia has other priorities in that regard).

Tone and Balance - As previously stated, it really does seem like you guys are trying to keep this as objective as possible, which seems like the most important thing you can do for writing a Wikipedia article. Again, the tone is more questionable in the male vs female section, but outside of that its overall seems like you guys accomplish this balance well.

Sources and references - The betting section doesn't currently have any references, but I’m guessing that's just cause it's a work in progress.

Organization - As this is not the full article right now, I assume that you will add these sections in a coherent and just manner, which I am excited to see the end product of.