User:Adinjoshi1/DoNotPay/SeenaBerkeley Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Adinjoshi1


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Adinjoshi1/sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * DoNotPay

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, all content that is mentioned is relevant to the topic including more in depth history of the company and improving existing sections.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, the new article provides more up-to-date information regarding DoNotPay


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, the content is inserted with a neutral tone, with no leading language.


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the content is concise and clear. The new content does not incorporate any confusing language
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Turn "straightfoward" into one word in the first paragraph, and a hyphen in "well-documented


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Yes, the improvements add context to the general idea of the company and also provide more up-to-date information