User:Adisuresh3654/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Pacific lamprey

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article soley on the fact that I thought the species looked unique and different. I also thought there were gaps in content that I could add to the overall article.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section- Provides good information about origin and general overview. Includes introductory sentence that clearly describes the article. It includes a brief description of the article's major sections such as the Biology and ecological impact. The lead is concise and not over detailed.

Content- Content is relevant to the topic and is up-to-date. The content is missing a lot of depth in the sense it doesn't expand. It is missing a lot of content in regards to the ecological impact.

Tone and Balance-The article is neutral. Doesn't seem to be any bias. There are viewpoints that are overrepresented but it stays neutral.

Sources and Refrences-Some locations lacking sources. Sources appear to be present just not directly cited in the article yet. All links work

Organization-Article is well written, concise and clear. Doesn't appear to be any grammatical or spelling issues. Overall organization could use work but structuring is good.

Images and Media-The images enhances the overall topics. The images are captioned and from my eyes, adhere to the copyright regulations

Talk page discussion- Didn't see much discussion

Overall Impressions-Article status is about at a B+ but good spaces of improvement where I can hopefully add