User:Adjarock/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Faricimab

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is relevant to the field I am going into, ophthalmology and there have been many recent developments in this drugs FDA approval and pipeline towards being incorporated as a drug used in patient care. My first impression is that there is VERY limited information available on this wikipedia page and much more information needs to be added for this page to be up to date and relevant.

Lead section

 * There is a strong introductory sentence that states the articles topic.
 * It does not occur a brief description of the articles major sections.
 * There is information in the lead section that is not further expanded upon in the article.
 * The lead is concise.

Content

 * The articles content is relevant to the topic
 * The content is up to date but is very sparse and contains minimal information.
 * Missing information includes detailed research on the drug as well as how it compares to other VEGF drugs on the market that are currently being used and standard of care. The drugs mechanism of action can also be expanded upon.
 * No, this article does no deal with an equity gap or address topics to historically underrepresented topics. However, it can because the drug is approved for treating diabetic macular edema and extends time to treatment which can impact the care of those who can not access it.

Tone and Balance

 * The articles tone is neutral.
 * There is no obvious bias present.
 * Viewpoints are well represented.
 * No minority viewpoints are represented.
 * There is no persuasion present.

Sources and References

 * The sources used are appropriate and up to date.
 * There could be more sources included, especially new studies available in the lancet.
 * The links to the sources work, although some do not have links.

Organization and writing quality

 * The article is concise, but more information/content is needed to judge the writing quality.
 * There are no grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media

 * There are no images or media.

Talk page discussion

 * There is no discussion in the talk section!

Overall impressions

 * This article can use a lot of improvement especially in content and development.