User:Adreana51899/Jackson Women’s Health Organization/Allissa Dawn Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Adreana51899
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Jackson Women’s Health Organization

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? No the lead has not been updated.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it does.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? It slightly mentions that it was vandalized, suggesting there has been issues with the abortion clinic.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? A photo of the building.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? It is concise, giving details on what the clinic provides.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, it is adding new legal issues related to the abortion clinic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, from November and December of 2019.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, the content belongs here.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes, it is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, nothing was biased.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The viewpoints are neutral.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The content is expressed in a neutral tone.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, the sources of information are relevant.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, they reflect the issues that the abortion clinic has faced throughout the years.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, the most current was added recently.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, they work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? The sentences are a little hard to read because it is just a list view of the incidents with their sources, but it is readable.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, there is only one section of the topic.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
''' If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. '''


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes, there are two new cases that make this article a little more relevant.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The content is shown to be updated recently because of the added content.
 * How can the content added be improved? More information given on the Gestational Age Act, maybe an external link added to explain that.