User:Adrianarias44802/Pocket Prairie/ArturoV29 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Adrianarias44802)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adrianarias44802/Pocket_Prairie?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead


 * The lead does have an introductory sentence that describes the article's topic
 * What the lead is missing is a small description about The Cleveland Pocket Prairie Project
 * In my opinion, the Lead is straight forward and right to the point, but just a quick fix with mentioning The Cleveland Pocket Prairie Project will make the Lead better

Content


 * The content, especially The Cleveland Pocket Prairie Project section, is both up-to-date and is also relevant to the topic, which is the Pocket Prairie
 * The Benefits section is also up-to-date
 * The content does fit into the topic and everything in the content does belong to the topic

Sources and References


 * The content are backed up up by reliable sources
 * The content does accurately reflect what the cited sources say
 * The links do work and the sources do reflect the available literature on the topic of the Pocket Prairie
 * I feel that you could find a better source than the one you have about the benefits, but the source you have right now is fine

Organization


 * The content is well written, easy and clear to read
 * The content doesn't have any spelling or Grammarly issues
 * The content is also well-organized and is straight to the point to the topic