User:Adriel824/Nike Blazers/VQuiche Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Adriel824
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Adriel824/Nike Blazers

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead is updated and concisely but doesn't outline the collab content. It is concise however.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
Lots of up-to-date content has been added to reflect the industry's most recent improvements and collaborations.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
The tone is neutral but it kind of reads like an essay rather than a wikipedia article. It's neutral but it feels too stylistic and conversational as opposed to just be facts.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
Sources are up to date and reliable, but not sure if it the links will be available in the future because a lot of the pages are product pages that GOAT might change in future site revisions. Maybe archive the site so there's always a backup?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
Content organization is good and consistent; especially in the collaboration part since the three collabs that are there are all consistently organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
The one image is well captioned and representative of what a Nike Blazer is.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
Article that you made is a drastic improvement over the original and is extensive in the collab part; Potentially all that is missing is a detailed history of the shoe because it is an iconic silhouette that's up there with the Air Max 90/95/97's, AF1's, and Jordans in terms of recognition and popularity.