User:Adrifaye/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Nobody Gets Me

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose to edit this article because my current favorite artist is SZA, and this is one of her new songs that she just released, and it is on many billboards right now which makes it notable. There is no content on the talk page and seems to be missing a lot of detail which I would like to help with.

Evaluate the article
Lead section- Introductory sentence is a little short, doesn't even say what album it is on. There is a table linking to all of the major sections, but is lacking a brief description of them. Since the lead section is only 3 sentences long, there is no info not present in the article thankfully. The lead section is concise, but almost too concise as it is only 3 short sentences. Overall, the lead section could use more detail and preview more into the rest of the article.

Content- The content is relevant, as it talks about the song's performance on charts, the music and lyrics, and SZA's background. This content is also up to date as some of the data is from just 3 days ago, but since this song is still trending, the content may continue to change and require updates. There is also content missing, as I believe there should be more about the album that this song is on, more about critiques than just one sentence, and just overall more detail in the existing paragraphs. This article does not deal with an equality gap.

Tone and Balance- This article is in a neutral tone, although in the critique section, there is nothing negative to say about this song, only positives which makes me wonder if there my be bias. I believe that this critiques section may be underrepresented as there likely exists more than two critical responses to the song, and because of this, I would say the only possible persuasion may be that the writer is trying to convince the reader that this is a good song. There are no minority view points.

Sources and References- Almost all of the facts are backed up by a secondary source of information, and the ones that aren't, just aren't cites, as the facts do exist in the sources listed. The sources are all thorough, relevant, and are written by a diverse group of writers. Many of these articles are written by various news reporters and many of them are links to the billboards around the world. There do however exist better sources such as some that I found in the UW library that are published biographies about contemporary black artists, including SZA, which could be used to enhance certain sections of this article. The links provided all work.

Organization and Writing quality- This article is well written and well organized. It is concise, clear and easy to read and does not contain any spelling or grammatical errors that I can see right off the bat. It is well organized for the content that they have right now, but I believe it could be better if they added a few more sections of information.

Images and Media- This article does not contain a single image, I believe it should contain images of SZA, her album SOS, and possibly of any music video clips to enhance this article.

Talk page discussion- There is no discussion on the talk page.

Overall impression- Overall, this article is a great start, but lacks detail and a lot of information, and I believe since the content is so relevant, there may be more coverage on this topic in the coming weeks and therefore even more information to add. The current strengths are that this article is concise, easy to read, and is correct in terms of grammar and spelling. It also doesn't seem to have much of a bias. However, I think this article can be improved by adding more content about SZA, by covering content on the album in which this song was recorded on, by adding visual aids such as images, and by just overall providing more information on each subtopic. I believe that this article is underdeveloped.