User:Adventuregurl97/Rapid sequence induction/Djfayze Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Adventuregurl97


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Rapid sequence induction


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Rapid sequence induction

Evaluate the drafted changes
Adventuregurl97's work plan included a number of goals including increasing the number of citations, expanding various sections of the article, adding pictures and illustrations, and editing wording for clarity.

Lead:


 * The lead was not in the work plan and was not altered for this assignment.

Content:


 * Adventuregurl97 added a substantial amount of information (with appropriate citations) to the Uses, Contra-indications, Risks/Complications, and paralytics sections
 * They also added other small contributions throughout the remainder of the article
 * Sources cited appear up to date and relevant to the article subject
 * No obvious content omissions are present
 * This article does not deal with an equity gap or underrepresented population

Tone and Balance:


 * Content added to article is neutral without the presence of opinion
 * There is no bias nor underrepresented or overrepresented opinions
 * There are no attempts by the author to persuade the reader - all information is factual in its presentation

Sources and References:


 * The majority of the author's additions are well-cited, with only one small paragraph without any citations (Risks/Complications, paragraph 2)
 * Content is an accurate and succinct representation of the cited source material
 * Sources represent a diverse and up-to-date selection of current available literature
 * Links are active and working

Organization:


 * Content is well-written to the appropriate level of understanding of the average Wikipedia reader
 * No grammatical errors are evident
 * Would suggest a slight rearrangement to sections, including moving "History" near the top and both "Risks/Complications" and "Contra-indications" below technique

Images:


 * The added image is relevant to the article, easy to understand, and adheres to the proper licensing requirements
 * Suggest moving the existing image "Upper airway anatomy" further down the article to create space between other image

Overall Impressions:


 * Overall, the additions to this article are valuable and contribute to a more thorough understanding of the topic
 * The addition of a contra-indication section and augmentation of the Risks/Complications section are strong points of this article
 * Suggestions for improvement include rearranging sections and separation of images (see above)