User:Advythr/Pleistocene megafauna/DanielleSP Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

User:Advythr


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Advythr/Pleistocene megafauna


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pleistocene megafauna

Evaluate the drafted changes
Great combination and synthesis of two statements (mammoths on Wrangel Island). Section on ecological consequences is clear, concise, and well organized. Your inclusion of this section provides a greater insight on the impacts of megafauna extinction that the current version of the article lacks. However, some statements could use a bit more clarification and expansion, for example what are biotic drivers and how does their reduced strength relate to restructuring the ecology? Without this explanation, it's difficult to see how it is relevant to the topic. Evidence that follow statements are backed by great, reliable and relevant sources. Overall, content is relevant to the topic, neutral, grammatically correct, unpersuasive of any positions, and back by reliable sources.