User:Aebner01/Aversion therapy/Agreeves Peer Review

General info
aebner01
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Aversion therapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
Regarding the introduction/lead section of the article, I think it was appropriate to not make changes to this section. The lead does well at introducing the paper, and the changes made throughout it are relevant to the topic and do not require a difference in the beginning structure. All of the content added to the paper has been significant and helpful for understanding the topic further. Additionally, I think the added section about the controversy of the topic is a very effective addition, as this type of therapy could be seen as some by more harmful than helpful; I think including this perspective of seeing both sides is very helpful for creating a whole picture of the subject, seeing the positive and supportive side as well as the negative and unsupportive side. Overall, the content added was applied in a neutral manner, taking an opinion of neither side but attempting to provide information from all sides, however I do feel as if the additions to the section "compulsive habits" could be reworded in a manner that makes the information a bit easier to understand. I feel as if the article additions included well-researched information in an organized manner, but the readjusting of some sentences to create a clearer understanding of the information being applied would make it even better, and especially easier to read. Great job!