User:Aebner01/Aversion therapy/Williabd Peer Review

General info
(Aebner01)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Aebner01/Aversion_therapy?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Aversion therapy

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The Lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic. I see a brief description of the major sections, which is good. Article includes additional information that isn't present in the original article, such as important facts. The lead is concise.

Content: The content is relevant to the topic of aversion therapy. I checked and the content is up to date. The information that is added belongs and relates to the article, and as of right now I do not see anything that is missing. The article doesn't address topics related to historically underrepresented populations.

Tone and Balance: I do not see any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position. I believe the content persuades the reader to see how helpful Aversion Therapy is.

Sources and References: The links that are provided work. After checking the sources, the information that is included in the article reflects the sources. For example,the section about alcohol addiction accurately reflects the article on Aversion Therapy for alcoholism. The sources are thorough and current. "Aversive Therapy For Smoking Cessation: Worth Revisiting? A feasibility Trial" is from July 2020. Sources were written by a diverse spectrum of authors. I believe there are sources out there that are good, but the ones included for this article are great.

Organization: Content is well written, organized, and easy to read. There are no grammatical errors.