User:Aeon1006/Archive-Beta

New Archive Start 8 AUG 06. Æon Insane Ward 06:19, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to see you go
Drop me a line sometime and let me know where you landed. Morton devonshire 04:16, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

BACK!?!!
YESSSSSSSSSS! WELCOME BACK! =D Yank  sox  16:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Ditto to that! Good to se you back! -- Nataly a 18:40, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Another
Welcome back; good to see you here. Antandrus (talk) 17:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back
Things are going well. I'm managing to be fairly productive at the moment. Hope all is going well, and I hope all of your troubles here are past and gone. EWS23 (Leave me a message!) 18:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the barnstar! I really appreciate it. Cheers, EWS23  (Leave me a message!) 21:04, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Pwnage
That pretty much sums it up. Welcome back buddy!!!! (Same goes as before, shoot me a line if you have any trouble. =D) alpha Chimp  laudare 18:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much bud! I'll display it proudly =D. alpha Chimp  laudare 21:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Need your help
Articles for deletion/List of songs deemed inappropriate by Clear Channel following the September 11, 2001 attacks, which you have edited in the past is up for Afd -- I think LGagnon's puppets are starting to invade now (e.g. DejahThoris). Thanks. Morton devonshire 20:17, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Yay! Thank you! :) Now, that you're back, you'll need a tank to get through everything. Yank  sox  21:06, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Two medcab cases
I see you volunteered to help out in Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-08-06_Darth Vader, but just so you know the same two users are involved in a conflict in Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-08-06_Bionic_Hand if you are interested in discussing that with them as well :). Thanks. Cowman109 Talk 21:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I haven't looked at the matter much yet, but it's basically just the two users not communicating. This diff is what made the case submitter upset, but it seems like all this needs is a bit of dialogue between the two of them to settle it. Cowman109 Talk 21:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
You are too kind, Aeon, thank you so much for the barnstar. :) Anytime you need to chat, I'll be here. -- Nataly a  21:08, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Good to see you back :-)
The heading seems to say it all so... 歡迎再! Welkom opnieuw! Bienvenue encore! Willkommen wieder! Υποδοχή πάλϊ! Benvenuto ancora! 再度歓迎! 다시의 환영! Boa vinda outra vez! Добро пожаловать снова! ¡Recepción otra vez! :-) אמר Steve Caruso  ( desk / AMA )  21:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

''Not a prob! and It seems that no sooner am I back that I'm back in teh middle of things again! lol Æon  Insane Ward 21:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)''

Speaking about "the middle of things" are you still in need of Advocacy? אמר Steve Caruso  ( desk / AMA )  21:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC) (PS Thanks for the Barnstar! :-) )

''Oh sorry not at this time AMA reasources are need else where I will let you know if something happens. thanks! Æon Insane Ward 21:41, 6 August 2006 (UTC)''

Whew! That is a good thing to hear :-) If for whatever reason you do end up needing help, don't hesitate, ok? :-) אמר Steve Caruso  ( desk / AMA )  21:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

A smile for you...


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! Michael 21:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you for the Barnstar! It is very much appreciated! Michael 22:23, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, thanks!
... appreciate it. I get a particular pleasure out of eradicating personal attacks. I like Wikipedia to be a nice place: it's that kind of atmosphere that allows us to work together. Antandrus (talk) 04:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you, Aeon. I appreciate both your kind words about my work and the Barnstar of Esperanza. --Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 07:45, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Stressed (again)
Thanks for coming back (and thanks for the previous barnstar). Im stressed, I think im going to get banned at this rate for making mistakes in the past &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 18:26, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Is there anything you can do to help? &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 18:35, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, I admit that I was a little incivil to a particular user in the past, but i've stopped doing it now, and their going to ban me for it unless they decide otherwise, and they don't seem to notice i've stopped &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 18:38, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The page is locatied here, the discussion is found here and here. Cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 18:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, i've replied to your comment. If I do get banned, I maybe still have a chance, I got maybe use the email this user featured on arbitrators and point them to all the comments made on the page. If I don't get banned, you will be awarded a barnstar. I won't be able to make any main space edits until this is over, but anyway, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:07, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but I won't be able to make any more main space edits until thr case is over, but anyway, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 09:58, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism (or lack thereof)
My edit of the Tintern Girls Grammar School was not vandalism. It was edited because 2200 is not an accurate number. If fact it was only there because the infobox was copied from another page that happened to have 2200 students. I removed it to make way for accurate figures once I have found them. 203.94.135.138 22:26, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

barnstar

 * Am I supposed to put that in my trophy cabinet? &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:46, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but it says on the description page its fair use. Is there any image that can be used as a replacement? &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:51, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Could I get your thoughts on these?
The colors are great! You should show everyone on the Esperanza talk page and see what they think. What were you thinking of having them awarded for? -- Nataly a 01:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:EspBSRib.png
Thanks for uploading Image:EspBSRib.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 06:05, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanx for the barnstars!
Hi Aeon! I second Minun's branstar! Btw, Image:Aeon10062.gif looks pretty classy, I like it! --Fir0002 08:48, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

re: Hey Steve
Hey Steve since the AMA is so short handed do you wish me to cut my leave short (And before you ask, I don't mind) Æon  Insane Ward 23:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I can always use your help Aeon :-) At the moment, enough active Advocates volunteered and the backlog is completely cleaned out, (huzzah!) so your help isn't as desperately needed as it was this morning. :-) I'll keep you posted! (And be sure to alter your status on the new AMA Members page.) אמר Steve Caruso  ( desk / AMA ) </B> 16:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Shiver me timbers!
Woo-hoo! TWO barnstars! I be breakin into the grog ration tonight! Thanks, glad you like it. Herostratus 23:42, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Kelly Martin RfC
Hello Johntex I have made a comment on Kelly Martin's RfC. However I noticed that he has not been informed on his talk page. Just wanted to give you a heads up. Happy Editing. Æon Insane Ward 00:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello Aeon1006 - thank you for your note. However, I think you are mistaken. I did leave a note on Kelly's talk page about the RfC.  It is no longer the very bottom comment, so I can see how you may have missed it.  BTW - I have now learned Kelly is a "she". Johntex\talk 00:58, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I saw your message on the Barnstar Brigade...
Hey,
 * Actually, from what I've seen, if you make a link, you're supposed to take them down from there, as they are all accessible from the link. The posting of the ribbons is useful if one doesn't have a Barnstar Brigade storage link...Just thought you should know. Michael 03:00, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


 * You're welcome. Michael 03:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
I really appreciate that man. I'd say more, but I'm busy on Colbert watch =). alpha Chimp  laudare 03:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Deleted userbox
Here's the code:

— sjorford++ 08:07, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Im back
You may have noticed I was away for a couple of days, and im back, and I appear to have not yet been banned. So im going to do a little editing again, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 13:43, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I noticed you've been very civil throughout your time at Wikipedia, so heres a barnstar &mdash;


 * Thanks for the WikiMood :P &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 15:18, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

AMA request - Aktornado
In regards to Talk:Golfers_with_most_major_championship_wins which has also spilled over into Talk:Tiger_Woods. I happened upon the Tiger Woods article and I noticed that in the lead paragraph, it was mentioned that Tiger Woods is currently 3rd on the "all time majors" list. I knew from common knowledge that he was in fact tied for second on this list with Walter Hagen. I corrected the information and it was quickly reverted back to third by user Stanley011. I looked deeper into this issue and have found that this has happened a number of times on both the Tiger Woods page and the Golfers_with_the_greatest_number_of_major_championship_wins page. The user in question has reverted this information after it has been corrected by other users a number of times (at least 20 times in recent months). As you can see on the talk page, I have asked him to source what he believes is correct, and he has been unable to do so. While I certainly understand his point of view, that doesn't make it correct. While I am rather new to wikipedia, I do understand that as an encyclopedia, the articles here should conform to what is widely considered the standard viewpoint. While I don't know what User Stanley011 motives are, I don't feel he is keeping the best interests of wikipedia in mind. If you could provide any assistance with this matter, I'd appreciate it. -- Aktornado 15:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Esperanza Barnstar
I'm afraid that I need support again to make it a WikiProject barnstar. The amount of support doesn't have to be large, it's just needed to make sure that Esperanza wants it as "Wikiproject award".--Ed 16:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Congratulations! Your award has been created and sent to Wikiproject awards. In recognition of your efforts, I award you this barnstar.

I'm sorry, I already made the template. Go to Esperanza, go to the bottom, and you'll see.

WikiProject
I am currently working on my own WikiProject (which was previously created last month, but is getting re-designed). When its finsihed you may be interested to join (i'll include a link then) cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 18:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Its the featured article WikiProject I previously creasted, but I have to restart it because its becoming ruined. Its just about finished so i'll include a link in a few minutes, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:26, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The project is ready, see the project page here, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:35, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks for joining. I've just got to set up the requests pages and it should be fully ready, happy editing &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I have created the request pages, please see the bottom of the page, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 19:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I have to go away now, see you tommorow, cheers &mdash; M in  un  Spiderman &bull; Review Me 20:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Hello
Actually, my comments on his discussion page were very civil. Perhaps you ought to review wikipedia's policy on incivility. With regard to the substance of his complaint, I have cited all of my sources as well. Have you reviewed my edits? Take a few moments to do that, then discuss the specific complaint you have with what I included. Stanley011 15:45, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

OK-- here is link one: --first paragraph proves that the amateurs were considered majors in Jones's era and are not now considered majors. Here is link two: --also proves that the amateurs were considered majors in Jones's era and are not now considered majors. The sentence "Jones would win 13 major championships, highlighted by his swan song quartet in 1930. In that year, he won the British Amateur (then a major) and the British Open, as well as the U.S. Amateur and U.S. Open" identifies Jones as winning 13 majors. Link three: --identifies Nicklaus as winning 18 majors. Link four: --identifies Woods as winning 11 majors.

I should also note that Aktornado has falsely accused me of removing sources and has labeled content disputes as vandalism. Do these actions violate wikipedia policy? I was under the impression that they do but perhaps I am mistaken. Stanley011 15:56, 9 August 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm not sure if I should be adding in here or not, but I'd like to reiterate that providing three different sources in three different contexts to arrive at one conclusion does not help your cause. In regards to whether or not your edits constitute vandalism, you're probably correct and I will not label them as such.  However I do think you are quite cavilier in your revert wars, and that is not consistant with the policy.  Aktornado 16:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Ok before this gets out of hand on my user page I will respond to both you you on your own pages. Æon Insane Ward 16:08, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

--this is from the Detroit News, and it states directly, within the article, that both Jones and Nicklaus have more majors than Woods. Stanley011 16:15, 9 August 2006 (UTC).


 * Aeon1006, As you may have discovered while researching this matter, the crux of the issue is whether or not amateur championships are considered "majors." As he has sourced, in the era of Bobby Jones, the four majors were the U.S. Open, the Amateur U.S. Open, The British Open, and the Amatuer British Open.  The Contemporary majors are the U.S. Open, The British Open, The Masters, and the PGA Championship.  This is not disputed by either of us.  However when attempting to compare the two, it is standard practice to either count all amateur championships, or none.  It is not standard practice to count championships for some people, but not for others.  You cannot do that because the matter of when the amateur championships ceased to be majors is a matter of opinion.  Therefore there are two standard ways to list "most majors won."  Either including the amateur championships, or not.  For example, see: http://golf.about.com/cs/historyofgolf/a/menmajorwins.htm

As you can see, on neither of these lists is Bobby Jones listed with 13 wins, while Tiger Woods is listed with 11 wins. It's important to note that the article in question here is a statistical chart, similar to the ones linked here. The first chart is the one most commonly referenced, as it is more applicable to todays standards, however both are correct. Neither are what is currently displayed.

Another chart depicting the same information (however it is outdated) http://www.pgatour.com/story/7871150

Articles which reference the first chart.

Washington Post: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/23/AR2006072300284.html?nav=emailpage

CNN: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/golf/specials/british_open/2006/07/23/sunday.ap/index.html

ESPN: http://sports.espn.go.com/golf/britishopen06/news/story?id=2527586

Fox Sports: http://msn.foxsports.com/golf/story/5809346

CBS News: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/23/sportsline/main1826867.shtml

Sportsline: http://sportsline.com/golf/story/9568097 Aktornado 20:57, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

As you can see, it is standard practice to use the charts I have cited, and not the contrived chart Stanly01 has developed, and as such I feel the same should be used here on wikipedia. Aktornado 16:39, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the info Æon  Insane Ward 15:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Spelling error in welcome message
Haha... Don't worry about it!!! I didn't think you were calling me one. ;) Seriously, though, thanks for the welcome!

Have a nice day (night?), Srose (talk)  02:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi
I've been away, but welcome back. --WHS 02:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Userpage1.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Userpage1.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:07, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to the Birthday Committee!
Thanks for joining! Awesome to have you aboard! If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me or any of the other members. Thisthema n  05:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, you joined? It's good to have you. Michael 07:23, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you so much for that barnstar!Edtalk c E  17:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Admin
Thanks =). Feel free to add a conom. It should go live today or tomorrow. Link

alpha Chimp laudare 16:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much! I'll drop you a line when I put it live. (By the way, it's a "mop" not a "mob" =)) Best Regards, alpha Chimp  laudare 17:29, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I dunno, sometimes a mob would help... alpha Chimp  laudare 17:34, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you so much! By the way, I forgot to put up your ribbon. I've been quite busy covering the 2006 transatlantic aircraft plot that happened today. Have you been watching the news? It's horrible!Edtalk c E  17:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Dude, what are you doing here!! You're supposed to be protecting our ocean or something! I'm calling the Admiral!Edtalk c E  17:37, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I added your ribbon WP:RIB. You can edit your table as needed. Happy editing.Edtalk c E  17:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Re: Smile
To what do I owe this wikilove? - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:13, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the smile
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

Good things deserve good things back, so LinaMishima has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! LinaMishima 20:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
<div style="float:center;border-style:solid;border-color:blue;background-color:AliceBlue;border-width:1px;text-align:left;padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing! RandomGalen 20:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Hey, thanks for the smile. Hope you've had a great day as well. Thief12 22:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Response
I said what I said because there seems to be no oversight to these administrator people. I can't in good conscience take back what I said until I see some, but thank you for your two cents. Attic Owl 01:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No offense, but there doesn't seem to be a chance of anything happening from that rfc, or ever. If i'm wrong, i'd be glad to be proven so, but I don't get how. Attic Owl 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S- I was going to apologize and say I should have called him/her a transexual rather than shemale, but I assume it's his/her gender dysphoria that is he/she is offended by rather than the word itself. Attic Owl 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you afraid of them? Why are you giving me threats rather than an answer for my question above? Attic Owl 02:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That's just it. She/he's not following it, and this RFC thing seems more like a glorified shouting match than any kind of disciplinary action. Attic Owl 02:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm rather frustrated, but you're probably right in the fact that my frustration is not helping the matter. Please, just do me a favor and let me know how I can help towards preventing users like him/her acting poorly towards other Wikipedians.Attic Owl 02:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Are those things any more productive than these rfcs in your experience? Attic Owl 02:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, why not go directly to the Arbcom? I had also heard that the Arbcom was also heavily biased in favor of people such as Kelly. Attic Owl 02:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Response
I said what I said because there seems to be no oversight to these administrator people. I can't in good conscience take back what I said until I see some, but thank you for your two cents. Attic Owl 01:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No offense, but there doesn't seem to be a chance of anything happening from that rfc, or ever. If i'm wrong, i'd be glad to be proven so, but I don't get how. Attic Owl 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S- I was going to apologize and say I should have called him/her a transexual rather than shemale, but I assume it's his/her gender dysphoria that is he/she is offended by rather than the word itself. Attic Owl 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you afraid of them? Why are you giving me threats rather than an answer for my question above? Attic Owl 02:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That's just it. She/he's not following it, and this RFC thing seems more like a glorified shouting match than any kind of disciplinary action. Attic Owl 02:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm rather frustrated, but you're probably right in the fact that my frustration is not helping the matter. Please, just do me a favor and let me know how I can help towards preventing users like him/her acting poorly towards other Wikipedians.Attic Owl 02:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Are those things any more productive than these rfcs in your experience? Attic Owl 02:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, why not go directly to the Arbcom? I had also heard that the Arbcom was also heavily biased in favor of people such as Kelly. Attic Owl 02:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Response
I said what I said because there seems to be no oversight to these administrator people. I can't in good conscience take back what I said until I see some, but thank you for your two cents. Attic Owl 01:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * No offense, but there doesn't seem to be a chance of anything happening from that rfc, or ever. If i'm wrong, i'd be glad to be proven so, but I don't get how. Attic Owl 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

P.S- I was going to apologize and say I should have called him/her a transexual rather than shemale, but I assume it's his/her gender dysphoria that is he/she is offended by rather than the word itself. Attic Owl 02:09, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Are you afraid of them? Why are you giving me threats rather than an answer for my question above? Attic Owl 02:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * That's just it. She/he's not following it, and this RFC thing seems more like a glorified shouting match than any kind of disciplinary action. Attic Owl 02:29, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm rather frustrated, but you're probably right in the fact that my frustration is not helping the matter. Please, just do me a favor and let me know how I can help towards preventing users like him/her acting poorly towards other Wikipedians.Attic Owl 02:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Are those things any more productive than these rfcs in your experience? Attic Owl 02:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, why not go directly to the Arbcom? I had also heard that the Arbcom was also heavily biased in favor of people such as Kelly. Attic Owl 02:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Good luck
I noticed you were a judge in Esperanza's best user award, I'd just like to wish you good luck, and heres some coffee -



3 things....
...Firstly, thank you for your 1st edit day wishes. It is always great to hear from a user like you Aeon ;)

Secondly, I just wanted to say congrats for all the worked you've done getting the Esperanza barnstar made offical. I've been away for the last couple of days, and havn't been able to say as uch about it on the actual page as I normally would, but I just wanted to say that I think it's really great!

Thirdly, and finally, it really is wonderful to see you back :)

Yours, Th ε Halo Θ 18:36, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the smile! :)
It's very much appreciated!!! :) Srose (talk)  20:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Me too... Tyrenius 21:56, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Me three...Remember 23:24, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

re: Thanks
No problem, and thanks for the barnstar!  °≈§→  Robom  æ  yhem:   T / ←§≈°  04:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Yea, I just dont know why they keep trying  °≈§→  Robom  æ  yhem:   T / ←§≈°  04:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you
Thanks for my barnstar! Keep up the great counter-vandalism work yourself. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 04:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

TCV
Yeah, might be a good idea. Viridae Talk 05:02, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks! Nice to be appreciated! Viridae Talk 05:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thanks! Nice to be appreciated! Viridae Talk 05:40, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for the birthday wishes! :) --Core des at talk. ^_^ 19:58, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar back to you
Francesco Franco aka Lacatosias 04:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Desysopping
Really? Have these desysoppings been one sided? I have heard that all the sysops that are suckups to Jimbo never get desysopped. Attic Owl 03:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Actually, I saw some responses on User talk:Jimbo Wales from Jimbo Wales the other day. I've also heard he's on the IRC Channel often. You're correct though, I should have said sucked up to Jimbo and his elite class. As you might have noticed, i'm a big opponent of social stratification. Attic Owl 03:15, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Will do. Hopefully there's some way to make Wikipedia equal to all. Attic Owl 03:31, 11 August 2006 (UTC)