User:Aeonx

About me and Opinion of Wikipedia from 10+ years of Editing
This user disagrees with over-zealous administration on Wikipedia and the enforcement of actions which aggressively challenge Systemic bias.

This user was banned for the first time in 2020 for 2-weeks for trying to uphold NPOV against biased Users and Administrators whom selectively ignore facts in order to push narrative or agenda that is WP:UNDUE and littered with single-sided bias.

The apparent reason of the ban was that this user was discourteous to other users and administrators, a point this user 100% agreed was the case. This user believes other users waive their rights to courtesy when they are discourteous themselves first and fail to uphold the fundamental principle of any encyclopedia - that is is based on facts. Any User or Administrator that thinks they are above the Five pillars and principles of good encyclopedic content; such as users that are Disruptive editing when they clearly know better, in my personal opinion, generally DOES NOT DESERVE RESPECT. Such people have often have ulterior motives and generally do not belong on Wikipedia. WP:5P4 uses the language "SHOULD" treat each other with respect, not "MUST" treat each other with respect; I take that to mean it is typically the case, but that there are valid exceptions to principle; some people disagree. The fact I was banned for taking literal interpretations of Wikipedia policies just emphasises the inherent bias all editors must strive to overcome.

Lastly, as I am unable to fight some particular bias (without getting banned), I will state Wikipedia is PARTICULARLY bias on articles relating to current Politics of the United States of America which has extreme anti-conservative bias. Wikipedia should not be trusted for such content. I in no way affiliate nor associate with the USA, Conservatism, or any such related topics and I don't consider myself conservative in any way. I merely identify the issue and non-NPOV that I have observed against facts and evidence, tried to fix it, and instead have been consequently banned.

A summary of Wikipedia rule making,... and a suggestion

 * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVIOmU3l0Zo&t=391s (watch 6:31 to 7:22; pretty much sums up my thoughts)

Transcript (modified to Wikipedia context): Since I grew up as a boy, I would imagine that, through the WP:VPP, from the time I was 18 or 19 years of age until now, there must be 10,000 new [WP policies and policy changes]. And I don't really think [Wikipedia] is that much of a better place... I mean this idea of just passing WP:RULES after WP:RULES every time someone blinks is nonsense. Nobody knows it, nobody understands it, you've got to be a lawyer to read books up to here, purely and simply to do the things we used to do. And every time you pass a new policy, you take somebody's privileges away from them.


 * To expand on this point, it would take the average reader over 5 days to just navigate and read through every Policy, Guideline and community standard; and of course reading something doesn't mean understanding and retaining it. There is simply too many policies, guidelines, advise, user essays, community standards, rules, principles, and how-to guides; they are too long, too complex, and many of them are not in simple English to evenly be widely understood~!