User:Aezakmi251/Elias Lahoud/AH-2031 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Aezakmi251
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Elias Lahoud

Lead evaluation
The lead is not updated to reflect all new content added to the text and doesn't include a brief description of the article major sections

(for example you can add a statement about his works)

Content evaluation
The content is relevant to the topic and is up to date.

Tone and balance evaluation
The content added is neutral. It does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another. No claims appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

The tone is serious, and that what is required for such an article.

Sources and references evaluation
All links work. Sources are current and diverse. They reflect literature available on the topic. But they used only one book and also the pages are not indicated. They should try to use more reliable sources (more books if found).

Organization evaluation
The content is well written and clear and is broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic. Some grammatical mistakes were found and I corrected them.

Images and media evaluation
The article include only one clear image which is that of the author.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

New Article Evaluation
It is supported by 3 sources. The list of sources is simple and not exhaustive. Maybe they can add or search for more sources

Overall evaluation
Good article. Needs more reliable sources and needs some improvement in sentence structure. Content is fine(maybe they can add more).