User:Af4718/Lee Bul/ILBO7water Peer Review

Lead:

It seems that you are working on an already existing article and not writing a lead.

Content:

The content you are adding is definitely relevant to the topic. The biography section adds to the page and is an important part of a wikipedia article.

Tone and Balance:

Overall it seems pretty balanced to me. There is one sentence that I think does not sound neutral:

"By the late 1990s, Lee Bul was known as one of the most radical and original, Korean artists."

This could maybe be rephrased as something like "... Lee Bul was considered by many to be one of the most..."

Sources and References:

There are a good amount of sources which seem reliable.

Organization:

The two sections you are adding are organized well within the article. They add to the overall organization of the article.

Images and Media:

None

Overall Impressions:

The draft adds to the article substantially by adding key information.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)