User:Afv513/Evaluate an Article


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Can you identify any notable equity gaps? Does the article underrepresent or misrepresent historically marginalized populations?
 * What else could be improved?

Which article are you evaluating?
I am evaluating the article over telescopes.

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because of it's historical importance to astronomy and to learn more of it's important content. My first impression of the article is that its short and very summative.

Evaluate the article
The lead section was appropriate to state the different types of technology of coined as telescopes, allowing the reader to direct themselves to specifics of what type of technology they were concerned about. The content shown under each subject for history, space use, and electromagnetic spectrum is appropriate in length. As for specific types of telescopes, infrared telescopes is referenced under it's own Wikipedia page though radio and submillimeter, x-ray, and gamma rays have a paragraph or two long detail summary.