User:Agm15/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminine psychology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because it grabbed my attention since I'm also taking psychology as one of my classes.

Evaluate the article
The first sentence of the article gave the reader a clear description of what the article will be about, feminine psychology. The definition was also a good touch for readers who don't know what feminine psychology is. The article is called feminine psychology and it was clear that it was going to be about women, but also men since the lead section talked about how feminine psychology is associated with society. The Motherhood vs. Career section of the article was a bit confusing since there was so much information in that part compared to the Horney's Theory section. It was also confusing because there wasn't much being said about the Mother vs. Career section in the lead section, so it wasn't expected. I think that mentioning something about the Motherhood vs. Career section in the lead section will allow the readers to have some knowledge about the section. The content of this article is still highly relevant and I think that it'll continue to be relevant in the future. The article is not heavily biased, but there does seem to be some sense of bias due to the sources being used for the article. For example, when mentioning Karen Horney, who is a reliable person, the writer wrote that she "argued" which is already telling the readers that Horney has her own points of views. All the facts provided in the article are backed up by reliable sources, however some of them were from the early 2000s and 2010s, so providing reliable sources from today would can be helpful in explaining how feminine psychology is with us in today's time. Overall, this article was good to read. Something that needs to be improved is the structure of the article since it does seem like one has more information than the other.