User:Agnihotrin123/Transposable element/Keianahaigh Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

1.    Is it obvious to you which sections of the article have been revised? Is the new content relevant to the topic?

'''It is obvious which sections of the article have been revised. The editor has revised the layout of the article and has added in new sections including negative effects of transposons and the editor has added a section listing diseases associated with transposable elements. The editor completely revised the diseases section and has made it more user friendly. They have listed the diseases that are commonly associated with transposable elements and have provided some direct links to them. The editor also added a new section in which they detail the negative effects of transposon, and they also added more content to the applications section.'''

2.    What does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any particular information that you found especially informative.

'''The article is very straightforward with the information it provided. I liked how many hyperlinks the editor provided to give clarity to the article.'''

3.    What overall adjustments do you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?

'''I suggest that the author include more information about how transposable elements specifically cause the diseases listed. This would tie this section to your topic even more. Also the author could revise the negative effects of transposons section by making the mechanisms part more clear.'''

4.    Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know.

'''I really liked the way you sectioned off your article, and I will be doing this to my own to make it more user friendly. I will also add more hyperlinks to other wiki articles about information written in my own.'''

5.    Is all new content backed up by a reliable source of information?

'''All the new content seems to be backed by reliable sources since the editor provided citations next to the content. However, I cannot see any of the sources under the editor’s talk page, user page, or bibliography.'''

6.    Are the sources fairly current (> 2015)? Check a few links. Do they work?

'''I am unable to see these sources. The hyperlinks work, but the intext citations do not.'''

7.    Summarize any typographical/grammatical errors that you found.

'''Under the negative effects of transposons section, the bulleted points have a few grammatical errors. Also, under applications, the specific applications could be bulleted and there are a few capitalization and punctuation errors in this area.'''

8.    Student authors are responsible for all images on their page (even if not part of their revised subsection). Double check the original page to make sure images are acceptable and clearly described. See associated tutorial to review Wiki image requirements. Summarize your findings.

There are no images provided.

9.    Identify at least one additional reference that you think may contribute to the article. Explain why you think this article would benefit from the new information. Be sure to provide the reference in your write-up.

Nat Rev Genet. 2008 May;9(5):397-405. doi: 10.1038/nrg2337.

'''This reference provides the basic function and evolution of transposable elements and I think that a section dedicated to this information would be beneficial to the article as a whole. People would be able to go to this page to see what a transposable element is and then dive deeper into the information that you already have.'''