User:Agonnella/Mary Beaumont Welch/Lburke17 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

The article on Mary Beaumont Welch by Agonnella, Cbittinger, Tewert23, Hslagel23.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Agonnella/Mary Beaumont Welch


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mary Beaumont Welch

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The content that is written is relevant and up-to-date. I think both of these paragraphs will be good additions to the existing Wikipedia page.

The content is neutral and does not contain bias.

The references listed seem good and are not outdated. However, it seems like there may be a few missing from the references sections. In the second paragraph, it lists information from references 4, 5, and 6 which are not listed under the references title and there does not appear to be a link.

Overall, the content is pretty well-written. I think the sentence that starts with "Her students only cooked," may need a comma somewhere in there. Also, the title, "bibliography," for the second paragraph does not really match with the information being discussed.

Overall, I think this is a great start and this information will already improve the quality of the article.