User:Agonnella/Mary Beaumont Welch/Mswan13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I reviewed the work done by the group consisting of users Agonnella, Cbittinger, Tewert23, and Hslagel23. Their article is on Mary Beaumont Welch.


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * 
 * Above is the link to the sandbox draft that I reviewed (the group has not made edits to the actual article just yet).


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Mary Beaumont Welch

Evaluate the drafted changes
The content that has been added to the sandbox is very relevant to the article. I especially think the new section that they are drafting for the article called "Legacy at Iowa State University" provides insightful information regarding Mary Beaumont Welch. All of the content that has been drafted so far is well-written and easy to read.

The information in the article is written from a neutral standpoint and appears to come from a diverse list of sources. There are five sources/links in the sandbox draft but only three of them appear to be properly linked/cited in the references section of the sandbox. Sources four and five are not in the references section and the links for these sources are not working so I could not examine them. I could review the first three sources, however, and they seem to be trustworthy sources that have relevant and up-to-date information.

I think the information that they are adding is providing relevant information to underrepresented areas of FCS since they are adding information on a female pioneer in FCS.

The group is organizing their sandbox in a way that is clearly structured and easy to read. They are following the same organization of the original article.

The group has a section in their sandbox titled "Bibliography". I am not sure if they meant to title this section "Biography" instead. The information in this section is very balanced, neutral, and insightful for the work Mary Beaumont Welch contributed. I wonder if the group can add any information on the lasting impacts her teaching has had. I am not sure what information exists for Mary Beaumont Welch but this could be an area they look in to add additional edits to their article. Also, they may be able to expand upon the lasting impact or current state of FCS at Iowa State University in their article if possible. I think the drafts they have made in their sandbox are very good and this group seems to be headed in a great direction with their article!