User:Agradman/examples of good and bad caselaw articles

If you can think of a better way to structure this page, go ahead and reorganize it.

=Templates= These are experimental.
 * Agradman template 1
 * Ironholds template 1

=User preferences=

Agradman
I really like the use of bullet points in the introductory paragraph to introduce the holding -- and I sub-indent the bullet points when possible:
 * Eisner v. Macomber
 * Pevsner_v._Commissioner
 * Farid-Es-Sultaneh_v_Commissioner
 * Commissioner_v._Duberstein
 * Commissioner_v._Flowers
 * Commissioner_v._Glenshaw_Glass_Co.
 * Raytheon_v._Commissioner
 * United_States_v._Drescher
 * United_States_v._Davis

When describing the judge's reasoning, I like using bold text to introduce the paragraphs:
 * Cottage Savings Association v. Commissioner
 * Commissioner v. Kowalski
 * Old_Colony_Trust_Co._v._Commissioner
 * Adams_v._United_States

Similarly, when describing the judge's reasoning, I like to summarize a long quotation in a sentence or two, then indent the full quotation for students who want to see the primary source:
 * Irwin_v._Gavit

I like cases that start with a "case brief" header up top, followed by an "academic commentary" section at the way bottom (to encourage students to add insights from their law-school readings.)
 * Haverly_v._United_States
 * Helvering_v._Bruun a good start at an "academic commentary" section

I think we should add a "citations" section at the bottom, in case Wikipedia ever aspires to replace Westlaw/Lexis Nexis:
 * Poyner_v._Commissioner

=General discussion=

=Recommended by Bearian= Sherwood v. Walker, Payne v. Tennessee, Taylor v. Louisiana, Donoghue v Stevenson