User:Agt3j/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Cerebellar tonsil

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because it is a stub article and neuroscience interests me. The cerebellar tonsil is part of the cerebellum which is involved in coordinating voluntary movement. My first impression of the article was that it is descriptive but generally underdeveloped and lacking in citations.

Evaluate the article
The lead section's introductory sentence partially describes the article's topic. The lead section is concise and describes the article's major section but also includes information that is not otherwise mentioned in the article, such as anatomy and location of the cerebellar tonsil. The article's content is up-to-date and relevant to the topic, but there is information missing. The article does not deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps. The article is written in a neutral tone but there is only one section (Pathology) and heavily lacking in citations. The one citation in the article is current but not completely accessible. The article is not easy to read due to the vocabulary used but does not contain any grammatical or spelling errors. The article is only broken down into one section. The article's talk page mentions the absence of a description of the function of the cerebellar tonsil. The article is within the scope of WikiProject Neuroscience and WikiProject Anatomy, rated as Stub-Class, and has been rated as Mid-importance. The article addresses the pathology of the cerebellar tonsil but generally appears underdeveloped and can be improved by adding a description of the function of the cerebellar tonsil.