User:AguaCertamen!/Hidden Away (2014 film)/Outdooradventurer22 Peer Review

General info
User:AguaCertamen!
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:AguaCertamen!/Hidden Away (2014 film)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Hidden Away (2014 film)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

I think your lead section has a lot of good information in it, but it might also be a good idea to introduce the names of the main characters there, since so much of the movie centers around the relationship between Rafa and Ibrahim. I know you say their names in the summary, but I think introducing them in the lead would be a good way to start off the article so the reader knows exactly what the movie is about aside from the broad themes you mention in the last sentence.

Content

Overall, I think this article has a lot of good content and also room to add content as well. I see that you're working on the plot section, and I think this is definitely a good thing to add. For the themes section, I would definitely make sure that you have sources stating the themes, otherwise Wikipedia probably won't like it. I'm not sure you can just cite the movie and explain the themes, since that might indicate some extrapolation on your part, but I'm sure there are reviews that indicate the themes that you can cite. I think you could add a bit to the release section about the production of the movie if you feel like you need more in there.

Tone and Balance

Overall, I think the tone of the article is objective and displays the information in a clear manner. I think it will improve a lot with the changes that you will make.

Sources

Note: I notice that a lot of your sources are in Spanish, and I wonder if you can find equivalent sources in English?

I remember hearing that we should try to use sources in the language of the article, but if it's too hard to find sources I imagine it's okay. I would say that you probably need a source or two in the summary section as well as in the plot section and theme section. You do have sources in what is now called the "conversation" section, but perhaps finding a few more would be beneficial to the article. I also notice that the article cites IMDB in the section about awards, and I know Prof. Allbritton said not to use IMDB, so I just wanted to let you know about that in case you want to change the source for that information.

Organization

I would maybe move the Release section earlier in the article and keep the Theme and Conversation sections next to each other, since I think they pair well together. As you said about the conversation section, I think it could be cleaned up a bit (the language could be made more concise I think), and I agree that the title of the section should be different. The information about the actors definitely seems to be more about production, and I do see where information in there would fit into a themes section.

Images and Media

I think you could try to find more images, but it might be difficult given the Wikipedia rules on images. Also, I think making a table to list the awards might be more visually appealing to the reader.

Overall Impresions

Overall, I think this article has a good structure and is a good start for your project! I think that the things you've written about changes you want to make all sound like good things to do.