User:Agudi0325/Post-orbital constriction/Ptama003 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (Agudio325)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Agudi0325/Post-orbital constriction

Lead
The lead overall is well set up. It gives new information that was not previously available on the wikipedia page. The lead does include an introductory sentence as it defines what the post-orbital constriction is. The lead is concise but with enough detail for the reader to understand.

Content
The content that was added to the article is relevant to the topic. The content is also up to date with the oldest reference being from 2004. There seems to be no content missing other than the section that is labeled as "Dali and Minatogawa I and IV".

Tone and Balance
The content added is neutral. The tone of the text written does not appear to be biased towards a certain position nor does it seem like they are trying to persuade the reader. It has a informative tone.

Sources and References
Although there are references provided, there are no in-text citations within the information. The sources are current as the oldest source is from 2004. The links within the content do work as they lead back to other Wikipedia pages about the linked word. All of the sources also appear to be reliable.

Organization
The content added is well-written as it is clear and pretty easy to read. The added information is also well organized as it was split into sections for specific topic information. The content does appear to have a few grammatical errors.

Images and Media
Although there were no images or media included, there was a suggestion to do so by another peer. This would be good to enhance the understanding of the topic. The editor would have to caption the pictures to make sure the reader understands how it is tied into the content. They will also need to make sure the images follow the copyright regulations provided by wikipedia.

Overall impressions
Overall, I would say the added content improved the article as it was a way to organize the information as well as add to it to make it more understanding. The content can be improved by adding in-text citations to allow the reader to know where specific information is coming from.