User:Agulyard/Differentiated instruction/JeaneKinopio Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Agulyard


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Differentiated instruction


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:


 * 1) There is good information in the lead section. I think there are some citations that differ within the paragraphs, and making the citations consistent will help the reader understand and able to read the paragraphs easier (applicable to all sections).
 * 2) There is information inputted about SIOP - can that be further elaborated? I think it is important, but the flow seems off around this information. Maybe adding information to relate to the general idea would help or maybe adding a content section about the material to allow for more information that is specific to ELLs?

Overall impressions:


 * 1) I think the content has added good resources with good information. The information is valuable and backs up some of the information given. I think making the transition between statements originally there and the new information more seamless would help the reader.