User:Agulyard/Differentiated instruction/Mkretzsch Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Agulyard


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * NA


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Differentiated instruction

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I didn't see a sandbox draft of any pending changes. I looked at the published article and it has a great amount of detail already about the concept and applications. I suggest taking the lead section and considering moving information to body sections; the lead is "overly detailed" in my opinion.