User:Ah51352/Rickettsia rickettsii/Cmurphy22 Peer Review

General info
Ah51352, CutterJackson, Nanwoodward, Karmartin
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Ah51352/Rickettsia rickettsii - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Rickettsia rickettsii - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead sentence could be updated to mention newly added topics such as a general sentence about metabolic pathways. Newly added sections could include more highlighted words that link to additional Wikipedia articles. The content added seems neutral and unbiased. The sources added appear to be relevant and accurate. It may be worth finding a second article that confirms the information found in the metabolism section because that is a lot of information coming from one paper. The newly added sections are well-organized. Overall, the new additions to the article seem well done, and additions to the lead paragraph to reflect these sections could be beneficial.