User:Ahackney1702/Auditory integration training/JZellMitch Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ahackney1702/Auditory integration training


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ahackney1702/Auditory_integration_training?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Auditory integration training

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

LEAD: The statement that AIT has not met standards for scientific efficacy is great. Saying this early on shows the objectivity of the writers to maintain truth in the article content. Noting the work of Dr.Tomatis is a good addition because it shows that there have been some efforts to improve this strategy.

BODY: Stating the connection between behavior & learning difficulties and abnormal sensitivity or insensitivity of particular frequencies is important. It gives a little rationale for why someone may seek out AIT. It was very nice to see the training regiment. It was summarized nicely. The benefits of treatment appear to span across other sensory activities. The update in the efficacy and evidence section was good. Seems that the research is still limited.

Overall, your edits were relevant to the topic and you listed good sources to back up the statements. Your updated references look good as well. Well done. I don't have any corrective feedback for you.