User:Ahashmi97x/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Natural science

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article due to always having a passion for science and learning new things, this article matters as it talks about all the forms of science that fall under the 'Natural" science category which is important for people to understand the differences and know what is not considered natural science. My preliminary impression was I didnt realize how many subcategories there were and how each section is backed up by peer reviews and factual evidence and though the use of expirements

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article is clearly defined, it states a neutral side of explanation as it states these aspects are peer reviews and are based on empirical evidence. The writing is concise, and formatted well. There are plenty of sources listed and visual points. It gets broken up to each of the subcategories so people can understand better. In the talk page, people discuss how there should be information how different scholars over the ages have defined "natural science", also people mention how computer science is not considered natural when maybe it should be.