User:Ahashmi97x/Nature photography/CH960364 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Ahmed Hashmi - Ahashmi97x


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Nature photography
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Nature photography
 * Nature photography

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Solid lead that briefly states what the article discusses

Clear, neutral language throughout the article

All content is relevant to article, up to date, and notable

Included sources are valid and reliable, however more citations may be needed in wildlife photography

Article is well-organized, broken down well, which makes it easy to read and understand

Images are relevant, cited, visually appealing, and helps the reader understand the content

Overall, really good start to an article, but it could be expanded a bit more with more sub-headings and citations