User:Aheadlee/Evaluate an Article

Evaluation of Genetic counseling article:

There are a few minor grammatical errors throughout the entirety of the article. The lead section does a good job of explaining the topic clearly and concisely. All the content is relevant and up to date, and the content comes from many different credible sources. The handful of links that were checked work just fine. The article flows well through each of the different sections and each section is relevant. There are no images, but the information does not necessitate any images. The article, overall, seems well written and is well-developed, however, the most noticeable issue is the grammatical errors. Since there are so many sections of the article, many of them seem very short, so maybe a couple sections could be expanded upon just to add more details, but the information that is included is explained well so it does not appear to be an issue.

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)