User:Ahmorgan23/Cora Johnstone Best/Geghk8 Peer Review

Lead
Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

- Yes, new content has been added to the lead.

Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

''-Yes the introductory statement is good, however it is very impact based, and not entirely neutral. As great as those impacts are, and worth noting, they don't emphasis her work beyond summiting peaks and taking pictures and videos and sharing. Also be sure to include citations to the statements.''

Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

- ''Again, the introductory talks about her lasting impacts as a mountaineer that documented pictures and photos rather than elaborating on the work done in her lifetime. WAit she was a doctor! Include stuff like that''

Does the lean include a brief description of the article's major sections?

- ''In a way yes? The early life section sort of stood aside from the intro.''

Content
Is the content added relevant to the topic?

- Yes, it does add relevance, there still seems to have lots to add beyond the early life section.

Is the content added up-to-date

- considering this is a historical article, by definition it is not up to date.

Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

- No additions seem out of place, all are relevant.

Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

- ''Yes, it gives the account of a woman mountaineer, which can be over looked in lost of history's scope. Again showing sources of proof of her impacts rather than just saying "paving the way". Maybe find other women mountaineers that wrote about Best, ect.''

General info
(Ahmorgan23)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ahmorgan23/Cora_Johnstone_Best?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Cora Johnstone Best and Audrey Forfar Shippam

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)