User:Ahol1226/Roosterfish/Bigbucktrouters Peer Review

Bibliography

The bibliography looks good with a sufficient number of reliable sources.

Sandbox

Good outline so far!

Lead

The lead has not been updated yet. The introductory sentence is well written but may need altered as new information is added. There are very few topics covered so far, but once there are they will need to be introduced properly. The lead could afford more details.

Content (Main Body Article)

There hasn't been any added content (make sure it's relevant though). I would add range, habitat, abundance, etc.

Tone and Balance

The content will be neutral by nature, likely.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)