User:Ahoog11/Cranchia scabra/Jdx84 Peer Review

General info
Lordenv, Whalenmr, and Fordaqq
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ahoog11/Cranchia_scabra
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cranchia_scabra

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There appears to be no lead section to the article, so I suggest drafting one once all the new information has been finalized. The current introduction to the article primarily focuses on the anatomy of the organism, which can be moved to a section labeled ‘Anatomy and morphology’. Citations need to be added to the information found in the current introduction section (though this may just be a copying error from transferring information from the main article to the sandbox).

To enhance user readability, the section labeled ‘Dorsal and Ventral Chambers’ can be re-labeled as ‘Anatomy and morphology’ with a bolded subsection labeled ‘Dorsal and Ventral Chambers’. The same goes for the ‘Movement’ section, where it can be re-labeled as ‘Behavior’ with a bolded subsection labeled ‘Movement’. The section labeled ‘Growth’ could also potentially go under an ‘Anatomy and morphology’ section, or be re-labeled as 'Life cycle' or 'Development'. However, using your judgement it may be fine to leave the 'Growth' section labeled as it is.

Research was well-conducted and the new information added was properly cited with working links, making the article more complete. It may also be useful to use the shorthand version of the species name when subsequently mentioning it so the sentences don't appear repetitive (i.e. using C. scabra instead of Cranchia scabra).

If possible, adding a ‘Habitat and distribution’ section may be helpful (if this information exists).

Overall, the new information added helped improve the quality of the article as it is presented in a neutral tone with proper citations!