User:Ahsieh3/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Chromopertubation

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This article was assigned to us. This matters since there are many women who have suspected infertility so this procedure is extremely helpful. When we first started editing this article, there was not much information so it took us awhile to find the sources to add in information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I think we did a good job keeping the introduction concise. The initial article had advantages, disadvantages, and alternatives which I thought were good sections. This article doesn't really deal with equity gaps. The article is from a neutral point of view and has many alternative options. We did not push a specific method as being better than the others. Each alternative has some advantages and disadvantages listed. The sources are all secondary sources found on PubMed or Cochrane. I believe the article was well-organized and easy to read. The talk page did not have any conversations on the topic when we first started editing. The article can be improved by elaborating on the sections, which is what we did. Before we made edits, the article was underdeveloped.