User:AhteyonaH/sandbox

Article Evaluation Social determinants of health in poverty
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * All subtopics in this article were relevant to how a person's social determinants affects their health specifically those in poverty. There were many different topics that I never thought of would be relevant to the article but they all connected back to it so none of the subtopics distracted me.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Yes the article exhibits neutrality. No claims, frames, or other biased positions were taken when writing this article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The viewpoints would be from those who are underrepresented such women, minorities, disabled, and those of low socioeconomic backgrounds who are often left out of things like these but it has the biggest impact on these populations.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The sources do work and the main article that is in the citations are those from the same article that breaks down how each group is affected by poverty in terms of health and other factors.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Each fact has a annotation and is from a journal that specifies how poverty affects women, minorities, those who are disabled and how their populations are affected by certain policies and other factors that can affect their health. The information for majority of this article is from Social Science and Medicine Journal, the source is neutral because it is in a journal and those type of academic books must be completed without bias only fact.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * The oldest article is from 1979 so that would be somewhat out of date on how the information was taken during that time. The article made a point on everything that would affect how poverty, health, and social determinants are all in relation to each other. The article further breaks it down based on race, gender, socioeconomic factors, and government policies and the affect it has on these populations.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There were not any conversations going on in the talk page when I looked.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * The difference is that we only spend time on how society and policy affects women both of color and white women and the factors that affect our population. This article explains that but includes how poverty within those groups are affected by access to healthcare, political affiliations, income inequality, etc. We focus on a very narrow or specific population with regards to these perimeters but not on a general or broad perspective.