User:Ahuet2019/Human trafficking in popular culture/Brittany3000 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Ahuet2019, Tnishia, Curtavian12
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Human trafficking in popular culture

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? The lead for the article is clear and attention grabbing for the reader.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it explains what the topic is and gets a little history behind it.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No, the lead doesn't have a brief description of the major sections.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, the lead has information that isn't clearly stated in the article.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The lead isn't overly detailed, it more short and sweet to the point.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, the information added brings more to the article and gives more of an understanding on the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes, the content is up to date in current events.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? The information is basically missing from the article. It's just consisted of the lead and then the references.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? The content so far is neutral because there is only references and sources for the article.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? There really isn't any information to pull a claim from for this question.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? There isn't any information stated to talk about the view points.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? The lead explains that they are trying to persuade the reader to understand that human trafficking is negative.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? There are a lot of sources that can back up the information when its finally added.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? There is no literature added yet to reflect the amount of sources in the article.
 * Are the sources current? Yes, the majority of the sources are current.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, the links i clicked worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? There isn't enough contented added to judge that, but the lead is well written.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Not from what I've seen.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The sources are well organized.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, there are no images added.
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes, it does meet the wikipedia requirements.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The sources are in the article because they are there to make it strong and clear for the reader.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? No, I didn't catch any patterns from other articles.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Yes, in the lead there are links to other articles to make it more understanding for the reader.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Not really sure what was added besides the sources, but yes its helpful.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The sources and references that are added so far.
 * How can the content added be improved? Use the information from he sources to make your article.

Overall evaluation
Overall, the article is good so far regarding the sources and references. Now its time to put the information together and create your article. Write downtime information and further explain what your topic is and what are the effects.