User:Ahuet2019/Human trafficking in popular culture/NatalieBullis Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (AHuet2019)
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Ahuet2019/Human trafficking in popular culture and Human trafficking in popular culture

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes but its all one huge paragraph, the person could break it up more.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No its one large paragraph
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Yes, some new information is added.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Overly detailed

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes, human trafficking.
 * Is the content added up-to-date? Yes all the information is up to date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? No they are saying how bad human trafficking is and how it started
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The could talk about the laws against human trafficking
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Human trafficked is horrible, no one is for it.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? I dont see anything cited.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current? Nothing is cited
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes the links for human trafficking, sexual exploitation and forced labor is all linked correctly.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes however it should be broken up.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? No could be broken down more.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No images
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? I dont think so.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes answered many unanswered questions
 * What are the strengths of the content added? Every detailed and informative
 * How can the content added be improved? By broken down more with paragraphs.