User:Ahuet2019/Human trafficking in popular culture/SierraWebb Peer Review

Peer review, Sierra Webb.
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Sierra Webb (me), Brittany,and Kassandra.
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: Human trafficking in popular culture

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Yes. The introduction clearly states what human trafficking is to an extent in many cases.
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? No. They should briefly explain what they will be covering later on in the article by mentioning it now in the introduction.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? The introduction is defiantly not overly detailed if any thing there needs to be more information on the topic to clearly state what human trafficking entails.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic? Yes.
 * Is the content up-to-date? Mostly up to date. The chart given stops at 2018 which is really recent.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? There isn't content that is missing but the article could use more information to show how international this problem is.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral? Yes. Relates to the topic.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Not that I am aware of. Basically they are just giving information on the topic not really going into any different headings that this topic could cover.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented? They touch on media that entails human trafficking a lot. Which isn't needed multiple times.
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? There isn't necessarily a side because human trafficking is obviously a bad thing. It is the definition of modern day sexual slavery. We know in the past slavery was a bad thing but now it seems to be repeating although in this case sexually.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Fair enough. There are multiple sources of information cited and that back up the information given.
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? They could have explained a couple things more. Or went into depth about the situations happening. Human trafficking from my knowledge is a multi million dollar corporation that has ties within and between countries for the accommodation of fast and high money. I feel like they could have touched on how surreal and international this problem is.
 * Are the sources current? To an extent. We have sources that are up to date and also some from a while ago. They all seem to have accurate information on the topic therefore reliable and okay.
 * Check a few links. Do they work? Yes. I checked the links and they work, bringing my to detailed articles.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes. The content is very easy to read and understand because it goes straight to the point.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? No grammatical errors that I caught with my eye.
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? The content in my opinion could have been more divided organized allowing them to pin point the different categories associated with this from of slavery that happens all over the world.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No.
 * Are images well-captioned? N/A.
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? N/A.
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? N/A.

For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.


 * Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? Yes. There are plenty of references whether secondary or not. Article meets requirements to an extent. There is always room for improvement.
 * How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? The list of source isn't terribly long so it wasn't too bad choosing which source to look and examine on.
 * Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary info boxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? The article was very basic honestly in my opinion. The intro was straight to the point with only 2 sentences. The rest of the article is basically a chart with information.
 * Does the article link to other articles so it is more discover able? Yes. Plenty of sources to choose from that further touch on the topic/problem of human trafficking.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? Yes. The information found further explains and touches on the topic.
 * What are the strengths of the content added? The strengths are explaining what human trafficking is and the different concepts human trafficking covers.
 * How can the content added be improved? The content added can be improved by explaining how this is a world-wide international problem. They should add how these people in higher power are profiting enormously off of the issue. Also, I would like to know about the cases involving human trafficking. There are so many people getting kidnapped to fulfill this illegal action, getting no justice. There aren't people getting saved and working on this problem from my knowledge. That's what can be improved. Giving a more broad scope of what is going on and how it can be avoided or resolved is a good way to wrap the topic around in the readers mind. To really get a wide scope of the problem and the ways it could be resolved and even why it can't be resolved.