User:AidanBio4155/Little broad-nosed bat/Danielle Chibuzo Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * The Lead doesn't contain any information in the new addition, it doesn't include any information about the article's major topics, and it's not overly detailed.
 * The added content relates to the whole article.
 * In my opinion, the new addition seems a little bias. especially the first sentence. To me it sounds like you're trying to persuade the reader that the species is very resilient, despite their small size.
 * Both sources supports the article topic and the new content.
 * The new addition is easy to read and well placed.
 * The images are well captioned and visually appealing, but they don't enhance understanding the topic.
 * I think rewording the first sentence, to a more neutral tone, would be better.