User:AidanCOMM2311/Social network advertising/Devthaker1910 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

AidanCOMM2311


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Social Network Advertising


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Social network advertising

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hey there, looks like you're still drafting your article. This is my review for your work done until now. I have to say you've done an amazing job, your content is well written and easy to understand. To improve it though, I would suggest you to add the lead section of the original article to your sandbox and add some intext citations and links, so that the reader can easily go to the sources for more details rather than searching that specific source in the references. Addition of images will definitely bring some improvement, However I believe that you're going to add the images considering that this draft might not be your final draft. Moreover, the date entered in one of your citation is incorrect, you can find out the citation by searching for "check date values in:" next to the citation. I would recommend to fix that error too. Considering that this draft isn't your final draft, you've done a great job! For more details, check out the answers for the guiding questions.

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * No, lead content is not updated in the sandbox.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, the content is relevant to the topic.
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes, the content added is up-to-date.
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Yes, advantages section is not populated.
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * No

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes, the content added is neutral.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, there are no such claims.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * No
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, content added is informative and does not persuade readers.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes, the page does have a set of reliable information. However, the published date in one of the sources entered incorrect.
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * There are no intext citations(maybe because the article is still under the editing stage)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources current?
 * No, the sources are not current. The latest source is from the year 2019.
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes, the sources are written by a diverse spectrum of authors.
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Yes, the data and statistics about social media advertising can be added from various articles as the data is edited frequently.
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes, the links do work.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, the content is well written. It is easy to read.
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Yes, it does have some spelling error(maybe because this draft might not be the final draft)
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the content is well organized

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * No images are added.