User:Aiden Brown/Hipparion/NicolasForestell Peer Review

General info
(Aiden Brown)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Aiden Brown/Hipparion
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Hipparion

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)


 * I like how you took information from the lead and moved to a new taxonomy section.
 * The taxonomy section is well written but I would explain what sensu lato and sensu stricto means since most people won't. I'm not sure simply linking to the definition is sufficient here.
 * Again the wording you added in the morphology section is too technical. You should provide some explanation so the general public can understand what you are saying. With this exception the additions and changes you made are good.
 * Don't write "11.4-11.0 Ma.", does Ma mean millions of years? You can write that instead to help people understand.
 * Overall good choice of article since it is short and lacking information. You have definitely effectively begun answering the need of expanding it.
 * Some of your sources are a bit old so it wouldn't hurt to see if you can find some more recent ones.