User:Aido2002/Archives4

Userboxes
Your userboxes weren't appearing on your userpage, so I've fixed it for you. If you didn't want this, I'm sorry. J Ditalk 08:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Personal attacks warning
Please do not make Personal attacks. Note: this is a warning. Ans e ll 09:45, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * First of all, I really didn't intend it to be a personal attack, but, in retrospect, I can easily see how it cold be taken as one. Regardless, I said this because he had attacked me, and, frankly, I'm glad he's gone.By which, I mean that I think many wikipedians will be better off without him, judging by his past actions. aido2002 19:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I didn't see why it was needed. They were blocked on their own volition quite a while ago now. And because of my own issues with the person I had the page watched, for vandalism reversion purposes I guess. I am not saying they were a nice wikipedian, just that you should probably type those sort of comments and then not save the page. No real harm done by it though I guess. Cheers, Ans e ll  08:40, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Could I ask you to rethink your replacing, what you agree could be a personal attack? It is not necessary to do that, and although there is discussion about my reverting it (see [[WP:RPA), your insistence on keeping it in its current wording, against an essential community policy, is not going to be looked upon in a very good way. Thanks, [[User:Ansell/Esperanza| Ans e ll ]] 04:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Well, I dis revert it once, because I thought that it is not supposed to be reverted, but, to tell you tell you the truth, I really don't care about having it there to go back and check, and keep reverting it. :) aido2002 04:34, 10 September 2006 (UTC)


 * If you could reword it so that it is no longer a personal attack but is just a comment about his actions in an objective way I would not mind. I do not insist that you not comment on the persons actions, just that you do it within what the wikipedia community thinks is reasonable in order to keep a good sense of community. Thanks, Ans e ll  04:45, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Re: Red Sox GA
No problem. I just didn't want to confuse people in to thinking the article was a Wikipedia-approved good article. It might be worthwhile for WikiProject Baseball to come up with a rating system that applies only to baseball articles (to get a broader range of evaluations), because right now an article can only be B-grade unless it goes through either the GA or the FA process. - Pal 20:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I've moved your signature template
I moved your signature template from Template:User:Aido2002/signature to User:Aido2002/signature. You can still use it just like a template. For example, renders as. This was done because single user templates are generally held in that user's userspace, rather than in the main template space. All the best, --Durin 21:16, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Aido2002! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk  15:24, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Late Night Sets.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Late Night Sets.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ResurgamII 22:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:South Park into.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:South Park into.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ResurgamII 21:17, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Manbearpig1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Manbearpig1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as or , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ResurgamII 21:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Old AT&T Logos.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Old AT&T Logos.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I see that you removed the orpahned fair use tag from this image. That is fine to do if you put the image into an article, but you have not.  If you do not insert the image in an article in short order, I will will nominate at IfD for deletion.  If it has a use, by all means keep it, but if it does not then under US copyright it needs to go.  Thanks.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (Contr.) 12:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * There is nothing "wrong" with the image or the text on the page describing the image. The issue that there is comes from the fact that the logos are copyright protected.  The only way they can be used on Wikipedia is through a claim of fair use; read that page for information about fair use.  If an image is copyrighted and not used in any article, it should not remain on Wikipedia as it contravines the copyright laws.  If the image is used in an article and that use fits within the fair use claim guidelines.  Orphaned copyright images should be deleted.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (Contr.) 20:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I would like to continue discussing this as I do not understand what you don't understand. Wikipedia does not allow copyrighted images - with one exception.  The exception is that images used for commintary about the image's subject can make a fair use claim.  Since this image is not in use, no fair use claim can be made, so we are back to the statement, Wikipedia does not allow copyrighted images.  As such, the image should be deleted.  If you would prefer, I will nominate the image at Images and media for deletion and a community concensus can be reached about the image.--Gay Cdn  (talk) (Contr.) 23:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Old AT&T Logos.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Old AT&T Logos.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:31, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Nominated again after discussing above and on my talk page about this image not being in use, orpahaned, and it being deleted.--Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 23:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)